Mounting Pressure on CalOptima to Release Corruption Probe into Andrew Do
In recent months, significant pressure has been building for CalOptima, Orange County’s public health plan, to publicly disclose its investigation into former County Supervisor Andrew Do. Do was sentenced to five years in prison earlier this year for his involvement in a substantial bribery scheme. Calls for transparency are coming from multiple county supervisors, emphasizing a commitment to accountability within local governance.
Among the key figures advocating for the report’s release is Orange County Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento, who also serves as vice-chair of CalOptima’s board. Sarmiento has voiced his intention to push for public access to the investigation report after it has been reviewed by the board. He emphasized the importance of governmental transparency, expressing that the findings should not just be hidden from citizens. "I will be advocating for the release of the findings to the public," stated Sarmiento, reflecting a growing consensus that the public has a right to understand the implications of the investigation.
Another vocal supporter for the report’s disclosure is Supervisor Don Wagner, who reiterated the necessity of making the investigation’s findings public. Wagner pointed out that even if sensitive information needed redaction, the crucial elements of the report should still be available for public scrutiny. "You can’t just say ‘We’ve done an investigation, there’s nothing to see here,’” Wagner asserted. Both supervisors underline a critical public interest in the accountability of local officials, especially considering the gravity of the offenses involved.
The urgency for transparency is further pronounced as Andrew Do was a highly influential figure within CalOptima, having overseen significant appointments, including that of CEO Michael Hunn. Upon his resignation amid revelations of misconduct, Do’s tenure drew scrutiny over executive salaries, contract allocation, and a potential takeover of the agency which was ultimately rejected by state legislators. Public concern remains heightened as the agency assumes a central role in Orange County’s healthcare services, particularly for low-income residents.
Despite the serious allegations against Do and the implications for CalOptima, the agency has not engaged in extensive public discussions regarding the report. Confusion persists surrounding the report’s specifics, including the identity of the law firm involved and the scope of their review. Board members, including Supervisor Janet Nguyen, have experienced limitations in accessing the document, raising questions about the transparency of the review process. "The materials received by the board are confidential work product," explained Sarmiento, aiming to protect the integrity of the investigative process while recognizing the challenge of maintaining transparency.
As the CalOptima board prepares for its upcoming meeting on October 2, the anticipation surrounding the report’s content and the possibility of its public release loom large. While officials like Wagner defend the current investigatory process, claiming that deeper reforms are underway, the community’s demand for clarity and accountability remains unwavering. The ongoing investigation and its findings could profoundly impact public trust in local governance and the effectiveness of health services provided by CalOptima.
In conclusion, as the pressure for transparency mounts, it becomes imperative for CalOptima to navigate the balance between confidentiality and public interest. The community awaits the findings of the Andrew Do corruption probe, with many emphasizing that open discourse is essential for restoring trust and ensuring accountability in public service.
Boost your health naturally—click here to shop Nature Made vitamins at NatureMade/TheOCJuice and enjoy 25% off your first order! https://www.anrdoezrs.net/click-101464393-15564446
